In an attempt to get this thread back on track I would like to introduce an article

http://phys.org/news/2013-09-god.html

It poses an interesting point about 4 key positions and the philosophy of religion

Kraay and Dragos propose that philosophers should evaluate the best arguments for and against four key positions:

•Pro-theism: If God existed, the world would be a better place to live.
•Anti-theism: God's existence would make the world a worse place.
•Indifferentism: God's existence would not make the world either better or worse.
•Agnosticism: The effect of God's existence on the world's value cannot be determined.


Thought's people?

Last edited by Orac; 10/06/13 08:13 AM.
I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.