my computer dictionary has the route for science. here it is, by definition: "[14th century. Via Old French from Latin scientia , from scient- , present participle stem of scire “to know,” ultimately “to discern,” from an Indo-European word meaning “to cut.”]
Encarta ® World English Dictionary © & (P) 1998-2004 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
therefore, by definition, you are implying that if it doesnt relate to knowing or discerning, then you wont respond. am i right in deducing that? (oh wait, never mind, you cant respond, so thats a rhetorical question). today, it seems people have defined science so narrowly, that they forget what its very foundations are: and that is to know. to know what? the planets? why we are here? history of our planet? what are we? etc.
and i understand why you would no longer answer on this thread; my apologies.
