Tim wrote:
"it is rational to beleive in a God. First, tell me this: have u ever seen a building?"

If your intent is to prove that application of synapses to conversation is not required you have succeeded.

For your statement is mindless parroting of what you were told as a child. Your second of even less value.

If you think there is a purpose ... go for it. But don't proselytize here. We have a way of dealing with trolls and those who think they can co-opt SAGG for their personal agenda selling their brand of religion.

One more post like the above and you will experience it first hand.


DA Morgan