Revlgking,
This topic is about Evidence for God. It has swayed well off the beaten track, but your posts seem to me to be about proselytising and little else. They also seem to be rather vague and fuzzy.
I have spent quite a bit of time on your web site and it seems that you have simply invented another cult without any real evidence to back it up.
At least Christianity has historical and textual evidence at its centre (of course their reliability and authenticity is entirely debatable, but at least there is something to debate and subject to a reasoned scrutiny). Your worldview seems to be something you have plucked from the ether that feels nice and warm for you ? something that Christianity certainly is not for me.
Your long posts are currently dominating this thread.
I would be interested to see this debate ask real questions about the ability to make falsifiable predictions about a universe that was created by a god.
I think it would be better to examine evidence for naturalism vs. supernaturalism.
Blacknad.
