Revlgking you are truly an amazing creature. You attempt to engage in a discussion of a topic upon which you seem totally ignorant of either fact or theory.

You wrote:
"will accept my right to define GOD as I understand GOD to be, I can prove that GOD is."

And if you will accept my right to do so then I can prove that god is an invisible purple rhinoceros. Or that water ice doesn't melt at zero degrees celsius. Or that soccer is the most popular sport in the US. Or anything else I wish.

For you to propose that we use your definition demonstrates either a lack of critical thinking skills or a willful and wanton disregard for intellectual integrity. Which is it?

DA Morgan