reasonable wrote:
"that it is the embodiment of everything that is. But once we adopt this definition, the topic of this thread becomes meaningless."

The topic of this thread has been meaningless since its inception. There has not been a single byte of information provided, by anyone, that constituted evidence.

This thread has done nothing more than serve as a vehicle for trolling and fluff.

The reality is that if the definition of god is as you state: "embodiment of everything that is" and revlgking has gone on record agreeing with that definition.

Then we have a far better word that, by dictionary definition means "the embodiment of everything." That word is universe.

Redefining another word is not just anti-science it is intellectually dishonest.

DA Morgan