Ellis. Good point. The other night during a debate on TV a Christian described Dawkins as a fundamentalist and I took up the expression without thinking. Of course we can't have atheist fundamentalists because there is no set text for atheists to rely on. On the other hand I suppose we've been misled by the expression religious fundamentalism. It's not fundamentalists that are the problem, it's extremists. Perhaps we should be refering to religious extremists rather than fundamentalists. Once we make that change we can certainly see the possibility of atheist extremists. When I think about it that's really the expression I should have used. Atheist extremists could become as dangerous as Muslim, Christian or Jewish extremists. How's that?