Wikipedia have a more relevant definition of trolls.
They:
"often contribute no useful information to the thread"
"concentrate almost exclusively on facts irrelevant to the point of the conversation"
I would add to the definition.
They:
"are here to proselytize and will use every opportunity to inappropriately advertise their pet philosophy. This may include constantly linking to (and promoting) their favourite websites."
In this case, it will be helpful for you to understand that bringing unsubstantiated New Age thinking (that is so woolly and pliable that it defies clear and rational definition or examination) to a site devoted to scientific and rational discourse will inevitably be seen as TROLLING.
It also seems clear to us that your only interest in science is when it can be used to justify your warm, cuddly nothingness about God.
I have seen your website and one of your key points is that the search for knowledge is more important than finding the knowledge - the journey, more important than the destination.
If scientists thought this way we would have no chance of eliminating cancer, because science requires concrete results.
You may want to stop wasting bandwidth here and find a more receptive audience somewhere else, because until you show an interest in rational debate, you will find little response here and even less respect.
Sorry for being so direct, but you are annoying a number of people here with your long, pointless posts (like 1000+ words on the 'Church of the Godless').
Blacknad.
