Paul wrote:
"they might become thought of as one of those CREATIONIST that do not comply with the norm."

That is a silly thing to say. In order to be a creationist all you need to do is believe that there is a god who created the world and the living things inhabiting it, as outlined in Genesis. There is NO science involved. That's OK, if a little ridiculous-- but if that's someone's belief who am I to stop them.

Scientists on the other hand require proof, and the proof for the validity of the Theory of Evolution contiues to gather scientific strength. It is not merely scientists who have decided that this theory is helpful in deciding what is the origin of species that inhabit our planet. It is a view accepted by many people of diverse religions, or those without such beliefs, because it is able to answer the question of the origin of the variety of species and the variety within those species. Creationism does not do this. Instead it denies that humans have a place in the development of the living things on this planet, preferring to use only one ancient religious book as source material. By asserting that Man was made by God in his own image creationists deny the species Homo Sapiens, the right to evolve further- as the original blueprint was, necessarily, perfection!