"Then perhaps evolutionist should drop that part from their agenda."
That's probably the silliest thing you've yet typed. There are many kinds of scientists who are studying many types of problems. Almost all practicing scientists accept evolution as fact. Only some of those scientists are actively engaged in studying evolution. There are others who are actively engaged in trying to understand abiogenesis. Those scientists also accept evolution, for the same reason that most scientists who study gravitation and chemistry accept evolution. They go on studying their own fields and doing so isn't part of any "evolutionist agenda."

"trying to disprove creation."
Scientists are not trying to disprove creation in any cosmic sense. They're trying to understand nature. Science - including evolution - is incapable of addressing god(s).

"fact is they have nothing at all as evidence for evolution"
Willful ignorance of science doesn't make it cease to exist.

"and any proof that they might find to the contrary"
So-called 'proofs' to the contrary invariable demonstrate the perpetrators have a comic book understanding of science.


"but I thought you guys already knew everything."
Never said or implied it. They just know more than creationists - which, after all, isn't such an amazing trick.