"one thing I've personaly noticed about false science is that it refuses to accept evidence contrary to itself."
You don't seem to be particularly adept at discerning false science from the genuine article. Here's a quality of false science: The purveyors are often accept very weak 'evidence' with utter credulity, and then mock extremely powerful evidence.

Cremo is not a scientist and I'm not going to waste more time than is absolutely necessary watching his idiotic videos. If there is a specific timestamp you want me to watch, I'll consider.

Cremo is a prime example of anti-knowledge.