Zephir,
The word "nonsense" has several definitions. It can mean that an idea is unintelligible, which is much of what you say or it can mean that your idea is absurd. It's not anyone else's job to prove that your statements are not nonsense. It's your job to prove that your statements DO make sense. At that you have failed miserably.


"You told us, my statement has no meaning - so it's just your job to prove it."
It would be a lot better if you were to demonstrate that your statements do have meaning. This is only the first of your statements in that single paragraph that is wrong.

I quoted you in the following:
"Every implication consist of pair of postulates, which are required to be inconsistent mutually, or they could be replaced by single one and whole theory would become a tautology."

This statement is itself almost a tautology, but a misleading one. It could be replaced with the simpler and more correct statement, "Implications are tautologies or they are false."

However, it overlooks a few things. First, it's okay for an implication to be a tautology. Second, a scientific theory is different from a mathematical theorem.

Third, in mathematics (or logic), true implications are always tautologies. There is no guarantee (or implication, if you will) that mathematically true statements (or any mathematical relations) have any correspondence with the physics of the universe.

Fourth, scientific theories, contain 'potential' inconsistencies, not necessarily 'actual' inconsistencies. This is because while mathematical systems are very simple and we already know all the rules and can make necessary deductions, science develops models (theories) where we don't know every case and every possible deduction.




Last edited by TheFallibleFiend; 04/07/09 03:25 PM.