Originally Posted By: Ellis
inconsistency does not necessarily imply similarity
Similarity has nothing to do with consistency. I never disputed a "similarity" here, so I don't understand, why you're introducing such category into discussion. Can you explain it in more detail?
Originally Posted By: Ellis
this is not only not a logical statement, it is also factually incorrect

If my statement is factually incorrect, it would mean, it has a logical meaning. You cannot miss the both: the meaning of claim and true value of claim.