Originally Posted By: redewenur
Interesting discussion but:
...one is tempted to differ in the light of certain other threads on the forum.


I am repeating the same question: Can we have an infinite number of finite things? Will it not be illogical to say 'YES'?. IMO, there can be limit to the number of finite things, but the limit is arbitrary. Bill S says in such cases, we can call it just unbounded or 'boundless'.

So I think it would be logical to have a 'physical infinity' termed as 'boundless' to represent a physical limit that can be arbitrary.