Finiter, the problem with your hypothesis is that there are so many experimental results that completely disagree with what you have said. And that is a fact. You cannot just say that the widely disseminated experimental results are all wrong. You have to show how they are wrong and provide a better explanation of what is happening. And you have completely failed to do that. Therefore what you are saying has no basis and nobody should be paying any attention to it.

You say you have written a book about it and it has not taken off, presumably because it is too large. Well, Newton wrote a big book and it was hard to read, but it took off. Maybe if you wrote one that made sense, the way Newton did, it would take off too.

Bill Gill

C is not the speed of light in a vacuum.
C is the universal speed limit.