Originally Posted By: finiter
Coming back to the subject, I think that providing mathematical definitions for physical entities is the real problem. All physical quantities should be physically defined. Then the definitions will be simple and understandable. And the end result, I think, will be a 'real physical world' explained fully in unambiguous terms.

Well, in that case you need to provide a good physical definition of the Newton's laws without using any math. When you can do that, and show how to use them I may be ready to think that you have something worthwhile listening to. Otherwise you sound like one more troll spouting off to be heard.

Bill Gill

C is not the speed of light in a vacuum.
C is the universal speed limit.