Originally Posted By: Orac

A simple light beam defies your description ... so light doesn't come under you physics.

Electricty, magnetism, nuclear energy all clearly not physics then.

In fact you end up with so little left its probably easier for you to invent a new category .... hmmm good name .... Flatland Mechanics (FM).

So lets see what Flatland Mechanics(FM) has left in

-Newtonian phyics
-Some parts of GR but not SR

Not exactly. Have anybody tried to incorporate wave nature into the corpuscular theory of light? The reverse has been tried: ie, incorporating particle nature to the waveform and that was a success. Light is light, whether it is waves showing some particle nature, or real particles moving along a three dimensional helical path. The observed results will be the same; but the former will not be part of physics if my proposal is accepted, and at the same time the latter will be a part of physics.