Originally Posted By: finiter

I repeat again: So far I haven't said that any observation is wrong. Can you give an example? I have given alternate explanations wherever possible, and concluded that the 'inference' is wrong.

I went through the site you have referred to (especially item no.7). Though I claim my hypothesis is a theory, it has not crossed the barrier to be called a 'theory'. For that, my hypothesis should be verified by the scientific community. If found false, then I may be tempted to resort to 'conventionalist twist'. In a way, 'conventionalist twist' has been resorted to in the case of Big-bang theory, string theory, and even to QM (this, I am not sure).


Okay so you really want to do this so lets start with absolute space.

Why does a rotating bucket of water produce a curved surface under your theory?

Nice easy one to start with.

I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.