Originally Posted By: Bill S.

IMO, the situation is almost reversed: the "unchanging reality" becomes a logical necessity, while the changing reality we observe is more difficult to explain.

Vive la difference.


It is only that we consider different aspects. 'The "unchanging reality" becomes a logical necessity' is a correct evaluation, but why it remains unchanged is unexplainable. 'The explanation of the changing reality' is what the science does. It is difficult, but is possible.