Originally Posted By: Bill

Finiter, if you have a better theory than QM and GR please provide an explanation of the precession of Mercury's perihelion, and the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, using your theory. Since you have a way to explain the problems with Newtonian mechanics you must be able to explain those 2 problems.
Bill Gill

In spite of the concerted and coordinated efforts, it has not been possible to incorporate both QM and GR into a single theory. That cannot mean that both are incorrect. However we can suspect that something is wrong. What I am arguing is some alternate attempts can be made. If such an attempt wins, then what I think is that the model will be as per the standards that I have provided.
Does Newton's concept visualize a static orbit? If yes, you should think of an alternate possibility, other than GR. What I say is that no concerted action is being taken to carry forward research in that direction. Not that I have ready-made answers.