Originally Posted By: Bill
Finiter, the problem with your hypothesis is that there are so many experimental results that completely disagree with what you have said. And that is a fact. You cannot just say that the widely disseminated experimental results are all wrong. You have to show how they are wrong and provide a better explanation of what is happening. And you have completely failed to do that. Therefore what you are saying has no basis and nobody should be paying any attention to it.

You say you have written a book about it and it has not taken off, presumably because it is too large. Well, Newton wrote a big book and it was hard to read, but it took off. Maybe if you wrote one that made sense, the way Newton did, it would take off too.
Bill Gill

My hypotheses does not go against any observations(as far as I know). But, explanations differ; certainly, it goes against existing explanations, not against existing observations.

The book has been made available only recently. As a matter of fact, I am not sure that what I have written is correct. However, it is logical and so I claim that it is correct (as an appeal).