So you're going to base your "conclusions" on a paper which deviates quite obviously from the original?

I'd say I'm surprised, but that's about par for you, given your continued scientific failures.

Still waiting for you have have the balls to deal with two papers which directly refute your hypothesis:

McElhinney, M. W., Taylor, S. R., and Stevenson, D. J. (1978), "Limits to the expansion of Earth, Moon, Mars, and Mercury and to changes in the gravitational constant", Nature 271: 316–321,

http://www.eos.ubc.ca/~mjelline/453website/eosc453/E_prints/1999RG900016.pdf

Bryan

UAA...CAUGCUAUGAUGGAACGAACAAUUAUGGAA