Count Iblis ... thank you for making an object lesson to lurkers on how easy it is for people to sound knowledgeable while pontificating poppycock.

You wrote:
"a finite number of stars"

A finite number of stars ... an infinite number of stars ... it makes no difference. There is no basis upon which to postulate sentient observers believing in god.

Thank you for the references. Have you read them? Do they make a single reference to Bayesian probability? No!

Do you read stuff or just throw it at the wall and hope it will stick?

Here's what your reference states:
"Recent developments in cosmology indicate that every history having a nonzero probability is realized in the infinitely many distict regions of spacetime."

So a planet inhabited by beings that believe in god has a non-zero probability of existing. You are standing on it. That says (1) nothing about more than one existing and (2) has absolutely nothing whatsovever to do with Bayesian Probability.

DA Morgan