dehammer asks:
"so ppl burning forest so they could plant crops were immoral."

Is this a rhetorical question based on forest clearing 100 years ago or is it contemporary and based on the current burning of the Amazon and Indonesia.

If it wasn't for religious hypocrites hell-bent on global overpopulation there would be plenty of food.

Just once I'd like to see a rational explanation of why this planet needs a larger human population than it had 50 years ago. Got one?

DA Morgan