what a BS video.
but I love to see that you guys are really trying and
that does mean something.
so as for your discussion about gravity = energy and momentum
what happens when a atom is drained of almost all of
its energy and as a result all motion within the atom slows to a almost complete stop , are we now to believe that the atom looses a proportional amount of its gravity since gravity is no
longer due to mass but due to a combination of its energy (which has been drained ) and its momentum ( which has also been drained)
?
whats next , I wonder.
I guess that as the atom regains its (energy) heat its gravity also proportionately returns or how do you guys work around that one?
also , the energy of an atom can be bumped up so that the
orbit of the electrons of the atom become further and further
away from the center of the atom , wouldn't your brand of fizzics require the atom to acquire more gravity because its
overall energy and its overall momentum within the atom have increased.
do you guys have a workaround for that one?
if QM is better than or more correct than classical physics
then QM must also overlap into the classical world as in
the two examples above.
else it would simply be philosophical.
is QM actual or is QM philosophy.
just curious because when I see things like the video you posted a link to I become afraid and worried about the future.
