Originally Posted By: Orac
I usually don't like Sean Carroll


For me, one of Carroll's strong points is that he usually seems to be able to explain things in a way that I stand a good chance of understanding. I know that doesn't make him right (or wrong), but if I can understand it, I can form a judgement.

At a brief glance, this article seems to be saying that in physics you can say that energy is conserved, or it is not conserved, and be right whichever you say.

Hopefully I shall have time to read it properly tonight.

There never was nothing.