Originally Posted By: paul

Genesis Chapter 9


Okay I am confused again .. are you saying you accept genesis is correct but not leviticus Paul?

Those versus are very generic but leviticus is the opposite it is very intricate in detail. I am interested in your view of leviticus because it defines "kind" as the bible uses it in detail because of the unclean issue.

My complaint at the moment Paul is I am taking the time to listen and try and understand your beliefs but 20 posts in and I still don't understand how you are determining "kind" classification. There are no right and wrong here classification is in the eye of the person who is doing the classification.

I was beginning to think you might be saying there really where no "kinds" there was only animals as per those listed in the bible but then you group horse, mule, donkey into a "kind" so there are some groupings going on.

Last edited by Orac; 01/02/13 04:12 AM.
I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.