Originally Posted By: paul
Bill

I didnt say that there were no fossils found in the different layers of strata.

I said that there are no ( TRANSITIONAL FOSSILS ) found in the
different layers of strata.

huffing and puffing and gentile readering about thing's that are
not in question might sound good , but really serves no purpose.

show us a website that shows pictures of transitional fossils

oh and please use the same species as it transitions from one species to another.

ie...

a elephant to a mouse.

but dont just show us a fossil of an elephant
and a fossil of a mouse , we need the ( TRANSITIONAL) fossils
in between.






Well, gentle Readers, there Paul goes again. Trying to distract attention from what I said by getting me to join in a discussion of what he said or didn't say. He doesn't pay any attention to what I said, which was that the facts are most easily explained by evolution. He doesn't address that, he just says that he wants intermediate species. It really doesn't matter to me that some lines don't show the intermediate species, the fact that they come and go and there is an ancestral resemblance between them still makes a good case for evolution.

There are of course many cases where intermediate species have been found, but of course that is of no interest to Paul and other creationists, so they will continue to ignore them.

Bill Gill

C is not the speed of light in a vacuum.
C is the universal speed limit.