... Unitheism as you mention is the theory/belief of union with God.
Not quite true. The quote you mentioned comes from Warren Farr's words on Facebook. And, as a unitheist, he has the freedom to use his own words. They are not my words.
They were the words you used in your post. If that was not what you were intending to convey perhaps you should not quote others as you in dialogue..
At this point, my theory/explanation of G0D is as follows: In my humble opinion (IMHO) G0D is the sum total of that which is physical and metaphysical and is powered by willpower--the greatest human strength.
God then without human intervention is powerless and without substance. Basically what you are saying is God is the sum total of human belief in reality, and that a god that is not democratically created or worshipped is not God.
TT, if you know that you have what you call...
What is superior to theory and isms, is the actual union or Being... where you are "THAT" "I am That". ... "... the stable unchanging foundation of all my changing thoughts feelings and actions for all of my lifetimes
All I can say is: Name it what you will, it sounds like unitheism to me.
Well you believe God is human willpower. That is not what underlies belief or humanity or the universe.
Meanwhile, I think that, for now, I will follow the example of Bill S: I will absent myself from this thread and, maybe, even go slow in the Philosophy of Religions ... thread which, thanks to all involved, now has over 3, 200, 000 hits.
With very few finding interest enough to participate, other than to speak of the weather and sex manuals. (Bills most recent post there...)
