Originally Posted By: Bill 6
I don't see the question.


The thought process (if it can be graced with such a title)went some thing like this:

“Models that do not predict this relationship between DA and DL, such as......the tired light model, are ruled out by the properties of the CMB.”

Orac said: “So probably start with why that observation ruled them out.”

Reversed question: Why is the tired light model not ruled out by this line of reasoning about the CMB?

There never was nothing.