I couldn’t think of anything devastating, so let’s try it this way.

The location of an object in space has relevance only in relation space. This may seem tautologous, but what I am really saying is that there is no reference point, outside space, relative to which an object can be stationary, or in motion. If an object is in space, and space moves, the object must move with it in order to remain in the same place. It isn’t a question of space needing to be tangible in order to move the object; the object does not move, it remains in the same place in space. The fact that one part of space has moved relative to another is irrelevant, the object is still in the same place.

There never was nothing.