Forclosure is a minor one, so you say.
Death by a thousand small wounds is still death.
Inability to compete. OK, but only for a commercial farmer who cannot revert to subsistence living.
Ignoring reality again, I see. "Substance" farmers have been involved in trade since humans developed agriculture. In reality, ALL farmers require some degree of trade - inability to compete means no trade, means your farm fails - commercial or substance.
And only if there are imported farmed goods which are even cheaper than the super-cheap local ones. Where could they be coming from? The 4th world?
Some from farms in industrialized nations, where the work is largely mechanized, and where production is highly subsidized. But it can also come from other 3rd/developing nations, where large mechanized farms already exist and there are low wage costs.
Simple desire suggests he's improving his life, so it's a good thing.
Or that he hates farming. Its not exactly an easy career path.
Ultimately I don't think the presence of a foreign factory in a 3rd world country causes a problem.
The preponderance of data demonstrates otherwise. ou insist on ignoring that data - doesn't mean it does not exist.
Since you're seem intent on ignoring the bulk of what I write, and the evidence I've presented, plus are completely unwilling/unable to support your own position with anything other than your gut feeling, I think this tread is done.
Bryan
