You continue to ignore those citation, and continue to refuse to provide evidence your claims are correct.
You call it sophistry but it's all directly related to the one problem I want to solve, which is also what you're circling but never confronting. I'm not actually making claims. I came to this discussion with a question along the lines of:
"How does the presence of a foreign company cause a person to quit his other occupation and go to work for them?"
I suspected it was because it provided a better life or future than his other occupation would have, even in the absence of that company.
You seem to be saying it's because that factory also sells goods to the local market, which drives him out of business, and/or the other locals he depends on for business. That doesn't make sense to me at this stage. I'm not interested in any evidence until I can actually understand the mechanism by which it might work.
That last sentence might sound strange. I don't want any evidence! Imagine you were wondering why the sky was blue. You have plenty of evidence by looking upwards. But that's not interesting, you'd rather understand reasons why it might be blue. Later you can check those reasons with more evidence.
Don't correct spelling errors. You know very well that serves no purpose except to irritate people.
