Originally Posted By: Bill S.
Would I not be correct in thinking that the data to which you refer stops short at about 10^-35s after the Big Bang?

If there is no data prior to that, why would any scientist accept that there was a Big Bang? After all, "no data is no data".


And that is exactly what I believe so now you do understand me and my angst at some cosmology .. isn't logic wonderful smile

You read the big formal warning put even into Wiki the big bang is a PROJECTION based on data and it comes with big warnings that there is no collider data to back them up but some people including certain scientists seem to just ignore that.

Last edited by Orac; 02/11/14 02:51 AM.
I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.