I should actually add I don't think anyone's choice of logic is better than another they simply are due to different goals. That is why I have no issue with Paul's answer I think it is perfectly fine.

I certainly don't think my logic is in anyway superior it just serves the purpose for which I want and is better for what I wish to achieve as my goal for science.

I still stand by that any answer given is probably correct to the person giving it but you seem to want to install a global truth Bill S and that is what I am struggling with do you really think there is just one and correct logic because your comment about my logic sort of intimate that?

As an aside and patch up there is also a new article on adding the natural numbers, 1 plus 2 plus 3 and so on all the way to infinity and it equals -1/12 smile

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/04/science/in-the-end-it-all-adds-up-to.html

Last edited by Orac; 02/05/14 01:57 PM.
I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.