Originally Posted By: Paul
And then you have your answer .. balancing of numbers/information is the only possible solution to that suggestion.

No other way with logic to solve that problem any other way and I already gave Bill S the problem if you try to invoke a place where logic doesn't hold.

Paul, if the universe isn't infinite, then there is very little chance that time is infinite. For one thing the universe had a fixed start in the far past. So while time might possibly have an eternal future it really isn't infinite. If Orac is right about the universe not being infinite, then I seriously doubt that it will have an eternal future. So if Orac wants to take infinity out of physics, then he automatically takes eternity out of physics. So I don't see what your problem is.

Bill Gill

C is not the speed of light in a vacuum.
C is the universal speed limit.