Kallog....As far as the photon is concerned, I am not saying that "when it starts out it 'thinks' it's already at B"; I am saying that it is at A and B, in its own F of R, in a sort of infinite "present"....
"a sort of infinite present"? Pardon the intrusion. Sound's like what I have mind when, in the Not-Quite-Science section, I use the acronym 'G0D'
Earlier you wrote
Well done Socratus! You have brought us back, at least close to the point where Gan set things in motion.
With regard to your questions, I would suggest trying to think of time as a static entity, through which we are moving....
I agree. Interestingly Paul, in Acts 17:22-28, expresses the same concept of God--as the one in whom we live, move and exist.
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Acts%2017:22-28&version=NLT
I prefer using the acronym. It helps me avoid thinking anthropomorphically--that is, thinking of a god in a human-like and limited form:
http://www.tnellen.com/cybereng/lit_terms/anthropomorphism.html===========================
