So this leads us to shock 2.
You can't unify QM into GR as we want to I will leave the background to some wiki reading (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics)
The GR an QM unifications section has a telling quote
Many prominent physicists, including Stephen Hawking, have labored in the attempt to discover a theory underlying everything, combining not only different models of subatomic physics, but also deriving the universe's four forces —the strong force, electromagnetism, weak force, and gravity— from a single force or phenomenon. While Stephen Hawking was initially a believer in the Theory of Everything, after considering Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem, concluded that one was not obtainable, and stated such publicly in his lecture, "Gödel and the end of physics" in 2002.[37] One of the leaders in this field is Edward Witten, a theoretical physicist who formulated the groundbreaking M-theory, which is an attempt at describing the supersymmetrical based string theory.
Now you probably understand why QM researchers view of Hawking.
Finally now the argument may have been settled by the LHC as super symmetry (SUSY) is read it death rites (http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=3864)
(
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmic...he-higgs-boson/)
So where does that lead us lets pick that up on shock 3?
