Yet again RicS you mistake size with quality.
2,181 words and not a single link to a single study that supports anything you've written.
Why someone might ask?
Perhaps because he can't find any.
He writes:
"Mr Morgan will not accept any research that disagrees with global warming or questions scientific methodologies"
But he is wrong. I will accept research. Long winded statements lacking in facts and peer review are not research.
He writes:
"I wouldn't suggest you look at future predictions based on computer models because to date none has proved even remotely accurate."
Which is pure nonsense (though I'd prefer a stronger word so please use your own substitution). Where's the evidence that the models are wrong Ric? Do you think us so lacking in IQ points that we will just accept your statement because you wrote it?
Tell us Ric why we should believe you and not the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
http://web.mit.edu/globalchange/www/MIT_R.Prinn.CT07.pdfTell us your qualifications
Post your Curriculum Vitae
Send us a list of your papers (journal, title, and co-authors)
ROFL!
