The big difference between science and creationism and other crackpot so called sciences is that science answers questions in ways that unarguably work.
then answer this question.
roaches eat dead roaches , and so do other insects and animals.
above are four species or variations of roach.
there is no telling how many species or variations of roach
have became extinct.
looking at the picture its easy to think of these four roaches
as a example of evolution.
however none are extinct.
now suppose that three of the species went extinct years ago.
and 1 specimen of each of the three was trapped in amber.
darwinist would claim that the evolution of the roach is
clearly visible in the three extinct specimens as compared to the surviving roach species.
and I truly believe that that is what evolution uses as a foundation.
do you believe that evolution could be wrong?
looking at the picture its easy to think of these five
as a example of evolution.
all but one species is extinct.
four of the species went extinct years ago.
and suppose 1 specimen of each of the four was trapped in amber.
darwinist would claim that the evolution of the species is
clearly visible in the three extinct specimens as compared to the surviving species.
a 40 - 50 million year old cockroach , looks like one you
would find today.
how are fossils ages determined?
by the age of the surroundings they are found in.
how is the age of the surroundings they are found it determined?
by the age of the fossils found in the surroundings.
