Nanoparticle Laced Wastewater Could Compromise Treatment Plants

Silver’s prodigious ability to kill bacteria hasn’t gone unnoticed by consumer product manufacturers, resulting in a growing number of household items that use silver nanoparticles to suppress bacterial populations. But these new products may unintentionally jeopardize water treatment plants, says a University of Missouri (MU) researcher who has found that the nanoparticles can destroy the benign bacteria used to remove ammonia from wastewater.

Several products containing silver nanoparticles are already on the market, including socks containing silver nanoparticles designed to inhibit odor-causing bacteria and high-tech washing machines that disinfect clothes with the tiny particles. But the positive effects of that technology may be overshadowed by the potential negative environmental impact, says Zhiqiang Hu, an assistant professor of environmental engineering in MU’s College of Engineering.

“Because of the increasing use of silver nanoparticles in consumer products, the risk that this material will be released into sewage lines, wastewater treatment facilities, and, eventually, to rivers, streams and lakes is of concern,” explained Hu in the journal Water Research and Environmental Science & Technology. “We found that silver nanoparticles are extremely toxic. The nanoparticles destroy the benign species of bacteria that are used for wastewater treatment. It basically halts the reproduction activity of the good bacteria.”

Perhaps more worryingly, tainted wastewater treatment “sludge” used as a fertilizer could compromise the soil used to grow food crops.

Hu is now following up with a second study to determine the levels at which the presence of silver nanoparticles become toxic. He will determine how silver nanoparticles affect wastewater treatment processes by introducing nanomaterial into wastewater and sludge. He will then measure microbial growth to determine the nanosilver levels that harm wastewater treatment and sludge digestion.

Related:
Nanotech Gone Bad: Who You Gonna Call?
From Little Things, Big Conundrums Grow
Persistence Of Triclocarban Surprises
Wastewater Reveals A Cocaine Surprise

Source: University of Missouri-Columbia

, ,

Comments are closed.

Doujinshi Trick Ne Pont (Rinpon) nanotechnology Honey (JoJo's Bizarre Advent... picture

Doujinshi Trick Ne Pont (Rinpon) nanotechnology Honey (JoJo's Bizarre Advent...

$40.00



Turtle Wax Nano-Technology 2007 Magazine Advert #234 picture

Turtle Wax Nano-Technology 2007 Magazine Advert #234

$5.59



Babylon 5 Crusade Nanotechnology Micro Machines Attached Article 3 Pages 1998 picture

Babylon 5 Crusade Nanotechnology Micro Machines Attached Article 3 Pages 1998

$29.99



POPULAR SCIENCE Nuclear Disarmament Bonneville Salt Flats Nanotechnology 4 1993 picture

POPULAR SCIENCE Nuclear Disarmament Bonneville Salt Flats Nanotechnology 4 1993

$10.99



RARE 1980s? XIDEX CORPORATION BRASS KEY FOB TAG NANOTECHNOLOGY picture

RARE 1980s? XIDEX CORPORATION BRASS KEY FOB TAG NANOTECHNOLOGY

$19.99



2016 James Bond Archives Spectre Edition Using Cutting Edge Nanotechnology uk2 picture

2016 James Bond Archives Spectre Edition Using Cutting Edge Nanotechnology uk2

$1.68



Vintage Forbes July 2001 Magazine

Vintage Forbes July 2001 Magazine "The E-Gang's Big Idea: Nanotechnology"

$20.00



Australia Avant Postcard 2011 Nanotechnology Project Sunscreen #14954    202 picture

Australia Avant Postcard 2011 Nanotechnology Project Sunscreen #14954 202

$3.18



Australian Avant Postcard 2009 Nanotechnology. Gene Technology #14005  45 picture

Australian Avant Postcard 2009 Nanotechnology. Gene Technology #14005 45

$3.18



Dai Sasahara Vessel Model Nanotechnology Arsenal Book Japan picture

Dai Sasahara Vessel Model Nanotechnology Arsenal Book Japan

$51.00



Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes