Home   |   News   |   Discussion Forum   |   Books   |   Curiosity Shop
Discussion Forum
Science Talk
Discuss scientific conundrums with our motley band of bamboozled boffins.
Latest Posts
a serious question to the forum
by Zephir
0 seconds ago
The Concept of the Whole and Threadism
by Kyra M
Today at 02:47 AM
Why is our blood red
by janelee
Yesterday at 10:17 PM
Unified Field Theory?
by TheodoreToth
Yesterday at 08:41 PM
CFL - tempers in the house of (representatives ? )
by paul
Yesterday at 08:10 PM
Search
Custom Search
Sponsored Links
Most Read
Hormones gone wild
Homo superior
New IPCC climate warning
In space, no one can hear you say "doh!"
Bow to your insect overlords!
Penis enlargement surprise: it's possible
Sex and the schizoid factor
Delusions and mental illness
We come in peace – not!
Eeew!
Small penis syndrome a big problem?
Have you hugged your robot today?
Down on the farm - yields, nutrients and soil quality
Cat parasite has global ambitions
Pop goes the planet
The disappearing male
Missing link a tripping chimp?
Inorganic dust formations alive?
Science Shopping
Sci Shop
Peculiar scientific stuff that you didn't even know existed and you don't need.
News And Research

Physics

Climate Change

Space

Natural World

Health

Technology



All 2009 News

Science Books
Book Reviews
Rusty Rockets reviews this week's science titles and lists his all-time faves.
Archives
2009 2008 2007
2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001
2000 1999 1998
Discussion Archive
Feature Archive


31 January 2007
Scientists Mull Why Size Matters
by Kate Melville

Researchers from all over the world have banded together to try and answer one of biology's most intriguing questions. Why are males larger than females in some animal species (such as most mammals), yet females larger than males in others (most insects)?

Study leader, Wolf Blanckenhorn, of the Zoological Museum at the University of Zurich, believes that enlisting many scientists to investigate the evolution of sexual size dimorphism overcomes the limitation of single researchers working with - and thus having data on - only particular animal groups.

Blanckenhorn's brigade set out to investigate how sexual size dimorphism comes about by looking at comparative data on 155 species of insects and spiders (arthropods) from 7 major groups. The results, published in The American Naturalist, suggest that growth rate differences between the sexes are more important than growth period differences in mediating size dimorphism in arthropods.

Depending on the species group, males and females tend to have equal growth periods (beetles and water striders), males have longer growth periods than females (some groups of flies), or males have shorter growth periods than females, albeit not quite in proportion to the size difference between the sexes.

In most arthropod groups females are larger, so they must therefore grow more rapidly - a pattern markedly different from primates and birds, which were also analyzed and in which differences in growth period between the sexes were generally more dominant.

Blanckenhorn discusses three potential explanations for why female arthropods can grow faster than males. The most intriguing of these explanations is that, although it is generally more efficient to produce (small) sperm than (large) eggs, it may be costlier to produce male gonads and genitalia than it is to produce female gonads and genitalia. As a result, males might need more time to mature at larger body sizes.

Related articles:
Females Get Into Sexual Selection Game
Researchers Investigate Giant Sperm Paradox
Balls vs Brains In Batty Battle For Evolutionary Success

Source: The American Naturalist



Home            News            Discussion Forum            Books            Curiosity Shop            About

The terms and conditions governing your use of this website.
Copyright © 1997 - 2009 Science a Go Go and its licensors. All rights reserved.