Home   |   News    |   Discussions   |   Books   |   Curiosities
Search
Custom Search
Popular Reads

Earthquakes and animal behavior
LHC may produce time travelling particles
Country boys boast bigger junk
Running the numbers on alien life
Uh-oh, placebo
Forgetful? Blame your house
Pill to blame for rise in prostate cancer?
Cat parasite has global ambitions
Carbon monoxide keeps city dwellers happy
Magnetic field alters moral judgments
Stars manufacturing organic matter?
Unnatural selection: Courtesy of The Pill
Men 2% funnier than women
Parasite rewires sexual attraction
Novel psychiatric drugs take aim at gut bacteria
Discussions
General Science

Not-Quite Science

Physics

Climate Change

Science Fiction

Past Forums

Sponsored Links
Browse

Animal Kingdom

Biology

Climate Change

Environment

Evolution

Genetics

Humans

Mind & Brain

Prehistory

Health & Diet

Health Threats

Health & Environment

Health: From The Lab

Mental Health

Reproductive Health

Energy Alternatives

Chemistry

Computing & Electronics

Nanotechnology

Pimping Nature

Robotics & AI

Physics

Space


Curiosities
Sci Shop
Peculiar and bizarre scientific stuff that you didn't even know existed and you don't need.
Books
Book Reviews
Rusty Rockets lists his all-time favorite science titles.
Archives
2012 2011 2010
2009 2008 2007
2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001
2000 1999 1998
Feature Archive


9 December 2005
Balls vs Brains In Batty Battle For Evolutionary Success
by Kate Melville

Without doubt, the most intriguing evolutionary pressure of all is sexual selection. The how and why behind our choice of mates, and how evolution has shaped our reproductive organs to achieve reproductive success, provide some fascinating insights into nature at work.

An elegant demonstration of the contribution of sexual selection to brain evolution can be seen in a new study from Syracuse University that found an inverse relationship between testes size and brain size in bats. The study, appearing in the journal Proceedings B, demonstrates the trade-offs that nature demands when reproductive competition is fierce.

Led by Syracuse biologist Scott Pitnick, the researchers used comparative analysis to show that male bat species that roost in larger social groups and those with promiscuous females have relatively smaller brains than species with females that are faithful to their mates.

Pitnick believes that a likely explanation for this relationship relates to the energetic demands of producing and maintaining both brain and sperm cells. If competition for resources and food is tough, then males can't afford to do both. "When females mate with more than one male, sperm compete to fertilize the female's eggs. Such 'sperm competition' is rife in many bat species, perhaps due in part to the unusual [mammalian] ability of sperm to survive inside the female's reproductive tract for a very long time," said Pitnick.

Consequently, males with relatively large testes and small brains have more offspring than larger-brained, less fertile, competitors. "The male who ejaculates the greatest number of sperm may win at this game, and hence many bats have evolved outrageously big testes - as much as 8.5 percent of their body mass," explained Pitnick. "Because they live on an energetic knife-edge, bats may not be able to evolutionarily afford both big testes and big brains," he added.

"The relationship between breeding system and relative brain size has received little investigation", said Pitnick, who hopes his study will spur more research into the evolution of brains, behavior and what he calls the "extravagant and costly ornaments and armaments favored by sexual selection."

Source: Syracuse University


Social

Follow Science a GoGo


Home         All The News      Science Forum         Books, Books, Books         Curiosity Shop         About

The terms and conditions governing your use of this website.
Copyright © 1997 - 2012 Science a Go Go and its licensors. All rights reserved.