Home   |   News   |   Discussion Forum   |   Books   |   Curiosity Shop
Discussion Forum
Science Talk
Discuss scientific conundrums with our motley band of bamboozled boffins.
Latest Posts
a serious question to the forum
by Zephir
0 seconds ago
The Concept of the Whole and Threadism
by Kyra M
Today at 02:47 AM
Why is our blood red
by janelee
Yesterday at 10:17 PM
Unified Field Theory?
by TheodoreToth
Yesterday at 08:41 PM
CFL - tempers in the house of (representatives ? )
by paul
Yesterday at 08:10 PM
Search
Custom Search
Sponsored Links
Most Read
Hormones gone wild
Homo superior
New IPCC climate warning
In space, no one can hear you say "doh!"
Bow to your insect overlords!
Penis enlargement surprise: it's possible
Sex and the schizoid factor
Delusions and mental illness
We come in peace – not!
Eeew!
Small penis syndrome a big problem?
Have you hugged your robot today?
Down on the farm - yields, nutrients and soil quality
Cat parasite has global ambitions
Pop goes the planet
The disappearing male
Missing link a tripping chimp?
Inorganic dust formations alive?
Science Shopping
Sci Shop
Peculiar scientific stuff that you didn't even know existed and you don't need.
News And Research

Physics

Climate Change

Space

Natural World

Health

Technology



All 2009 News

Science Books
Book Reviews
Rusty Rockets reviews this week's science titles and lists his all-time faves.
Archives
2009 2008 2007
2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001
2000 1999 1998
Discussion Archive
Feature Archive


9 December 2005
Balls vs Brains In Batty Battle For Evolutionary Success
by Kate Melville

Without doubt, the most intriguing evolutionary pressure of all is sexual selection. The how and why behind our choice of mates, and how evolution has shaped our reproductive organs to achieve reproductive success, provide some fascinating insights into nature at work.

An elegant demonstration of the contribution of sexual selection to brain evolution can be seen in a new study from Syracuse University that found an inverse relationship between testes size and brain size in bats. The study, appearing in the journal Proceedings B, demonstrates the trade-offs that nature demands when reproductive competition is fierce.

Led by Syracuse biologist Scott Pitnick, the researchers used comparative analysis to show that male bat species that roost in larger social groups and those with promiscuous females have relatively smaller brains than species with females that are faithful to their mates.

Pitnick believes that a likely explanation for this relationship relates to the energetic demands of producing and maintaining both brain and sperm cells. If competition for resources and food is tough, then males can't afford to do both. "When females mate with more than one male, sperm compete to fertilize the female's eggs. Such 'sperm competition' is rife in many bat species, perhaps due in part to the unusual [mammalian] ability of sperm to survive inside the female's reproductive tract for a very long time," said Pitnick.

Consequently, males with relatively large testes and small brains have more offspring than larger-brained, less fertile, competitors. "The male who ejaculates the greatest number of sperm may win at this game, and hence many bats have evolved outrageously big testes - as much as 8.5 percent of their body mass," explained Pitnick. "Because they live on an energetic knife-edge, bats may not be able to evolutionarily afford both big testes and big brains," he added.

"The relationship between breeding system and relative brain size has received little investigation", said Pitnick, who hopes his study will spur more research into the evolution of brains, behavior and what he calls the "extravagant and costly ornaments and armaments favored by sexual selection."

Source: Syracuse University



Home            News            Discussion Forum            Books            Curiosity Shop            About

The terms and conditions governing your use of this website.
Copyright © 1997 - 2009 Science a Go Go and its licensors. All rights reserved.