Home   |   News    |   Discussions   |   Books   |   Curiosities
Search
Custom Search
Popular Reads

Earthquakes and animal behavior
LHC may produce time travelling particles
Country boys boast bigger junk
Running the numbers on alien life
Uh-oh, placebo
Forgetful? Blame your house
Pill to blame for rise in prostate cancer?
Cat parasite has global ambitions
Carbon monoxide keeps city dwellers happy
Magnetic field alters moral judgments
Stars manufacturing organic matter?
Unnatural selection: Courtesy of The Pill
Men 2% funnier than women
Parasite rewires sexual attraction
Novel psychiatric drugs take aim at gut bacteria
Discussions
General Science

Not-Quite Science

Physics

Climate Change

Science Fiction

Past Forums

Sponsored Links
Browse

Animal Kingdom

Biology

Climate Change

Environment

Evolution

Genetics

Humans

Mind & Brain

Prehistory

Health & Diet

Health Threats

Health & Environment

Health: From The Lab

Mental Health

Reproductive Health

Energy Alternatives

Chemistry

Computing & Electronics

Nanotechnology

Pimping Nature

Robotics & AI

Physics

Space


Curiosities
Sci Shop
Peculiar and bizarre scientific stuff that you didn't even know existed and you don't need.
Books
Book Reviews
Rusty Rockets lists his all-time favorite science titles.
Archives
2012 2011 2010
2009 2008 2007
2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001
2000 1999 1998
Feature Archive


26 July 2006
Crop Yields Set To Plunge
by Kate Melville

Past research indicated that rising levels of greenhouse gases could benefit crop yields, but that theory now looks to be incorrect. Worrying new research from the University of Illinois (UI) suggests that rising carbon dioxide levels could in fact trigger serious food shortages. The researchers based their findings on open-air field trials involving five major food crops grown under carbon-dioxide levels that are expected to occur in the near future. They found that crop yields plunged dramatically and warned that future global food supplies could be at risk without changes in food production methodologies.

Importantly, the results were gleaned from a half-dozen test locations around the world, rather than a single research plot. According to the analysis, published in the journal Science, crop yields are running at about 50 percent below those from enclosed (rather than open-air) test conditions.

UI researcher, Stephen P. Long, said the results "indicate a much smaller CO2 fertilization effect on yield than currently assumed for C3 crops, such as rice, wheat and soybeans, and possibly little or no stimulation for C4 crops that include maize and sorghum."

The research project used Free-Air Concentration Enrichment (FACE) technology, which allowed the scientists to grow the test crops in open-air fields, with elevated levels of carbon dioxide simulating the composition of the atmosphere projected for the year 2050. Additionally, the researchers added a unique element by introducing surface-level ozone, which also is rising. This project is the first to test both the effects of future ozone and CO2 levels on crops in the open-air. Previous studies had all been carried out in greenhouses or controlled environmental chambers.

The older studies suggested that increased soil temperature and decreased soil moisture (which would reduce crop yields) would likely be offset by the fertilization effect of rising CO2, primarily because CO2 increases photosynthesis and decreases crop water use. But plants grown in enclosures can differ greatly from those grown in farm fields and FACE has been the only technology that has tested effects in real-world situations.

With the new study, for each crop tested, yields have been "well below [about half] the value predicted from chambers," the researchers reported. The results encompassed grain yield, total biomass and effects on photosynthesis. In fact, in three key production measures, 11 out of 12 factors scrutinized were lower than the chamber equivalents. "The FACE experiments clearly show that much lower CO2 fertilization factors should be used in model projections of future yields," the researchers said.

And while projections to 2050 may be too far out for commercial considerations, the researchers believe action is required now. "It must not be seen as too far in the future for public sector research and development, given the long lead times that may be needed to avoid global food shortage," they concluded.

Source: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign


Social

Follow Science a GoGo


Home         All The News      Science Forum         Books, Books, Books         Curiosity Shop         About

The terms and conditions governing your use of this website.
Copyright © 1997 - 2012 Science a Go Go and its licensors. All rights reserved.