Researchers Slam Media Over Wrong-Headed Plant-Methane Hype

The researchers who found that plants emit significant quantities of the greenhouse gas methane have come out swinging at what they believe is widespread “misinterpretation of the findings” by worldwide media.

The original study in Nature, conducted by scientists from the Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics and the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development for Northern Ireland, revealed that plants produce the greenhouse gas methane.

The scientists say that while there has been extended media coverage of this work, in many instances, it is based on a misinterpretation of the findings. They are concerned that that this misinterpretation may undermine reforestation programs in the framework of the Kyoto protocol and have issued a clarification explaining the findings in detail.

According to the researchers, the most frequent misinterpretation was that the emission of methane from plants was responsible for global warming. They explain that these emissions have existed since long before man arrived on the scene and that plant emissions are part of what they call “the natural greenhouse effect.” These emissions should not be confused with the anthropogenic (man-made) emissions which are responsible for the well-documented increasing atmospheric concentrations of methane since pre-industrial times. The researchers added that even if land use practices have altered plant methane emissions (which the study did not examine), this would also be regarded as an anthropogenic source.

The original study also fueled intense speculation that methane emissions by plants could diminish, or even outweigh, the carbon storage effect of reforestation programs, with important implications for the Kyoto protocol, where such programs are to be used in carbon dioxide reduction strategies.

The researchers say that while these estimates show that methane emissions by plants may slightly diminish the effect of reforestation programs, the climatic benefits gained through carbon sequestration by reforestation far exceed the relatively small negative effect, which may reduce the beneficial carbon uptake effect by around 4 percent. They add that, “the potential for reduction of global warming by planting trees is most definitely positive. The fundamental problem still remaining is the global large-scale anthropogenic burning of fossil fuels.”

Source: Max Planck Institute

, , ,

Comments are closed.

Old World Christmas Glass Greenhouse Ornament picture

Old World Christmas Glass Greenhouse Ornament

$21.99



Windowpane Greenhouse Display 34

Windowpane Greenhouse Display 34" x 17.25" x 36" Gallerie II

$217.80



Found Photo of Mabel Palmer at Little Bit O Heaven Greenhouse Chiropractic Photo picture

Found Photo of Mabel Palmer at Little Bit O Heaven Greenhouse Chiropractic Photo

$210.00



Department 56 Dickens Village  Margrove Orangery (#56.58440) RARE picture

Department 56 Dickens Village Margrove Orangery (#56.58440) RARE

$130.00



Vintage Blue White Ceramic Lamb Sheep Planter Decoration Nursery Baby Cute picture

Vintage Blue White Ceramic Lamb Sheep Planter Decoration Nursery Baby Cute

$12.95



Dept 56 Heritage Village Collection Mrs Claus Greenhouse North Pole Series 56395 picture

Dept 56 Heritage Village Collection Mrs Claus Greenhouse North Pole Series 56395

$49.16



Department 56 Snow Village

Department 56 Snow Village "Village Greenhouse" In Box #5402 w/Light Vtg 1991

$26.99



christmas village Greenhouse  picture

christmas village Greenhouse

$22.00



Dept 56 Dickens Village Margrove Orangery Lighted Greenhouse Retired #58440 READ picture

Dept 56 Dickens Village Margrove Orangery Lighted Greenhouse Retired #58440 READ

$85.00



Dept 56 North Pole

Dept 56 North Pole "Mrs. Claus' Greenhouse" Lighted Christmas 56395**see Descrip

$68.00



Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes