Orac
From Bill s's post.
12. It should, therefore, be reasonable to conclude
that an orbiting body is not accelerating.
your reply to bill s's #12
If you can't measure an acceleration you aren't smile
Don't mix frameworks as you can't, the definitions of spacetime
differ and you will just get confused.
Your statement (12) is correct in GR because you can't measure
any acceleration with an accelerometer not because of any
classical physics calculations. It is true by definition
in GR and requires NO calculations.
my reply to bill s's #12
12. It should, therefore, be reasonable to conclude that an orbiting body is not accelerating.
incorrect.
there can not be an orbiting body that does not accelerate
around a orbited body.
an object will travel in a straight line if it is
not accelerated in another direction away from the straight line.
you seem to think or is it that you believe
that you are not undergoing constant acceleration
because you cannot measure that acceleration.
you really do need to go back and first learn the
basics of physics before you try to dump on classical physics.
if your belief or the GR belief believes that ...
It should, therefore, be reasonable to conclude
that an orbiting body is not accelerating
then that clearly tells me that your belief and the
belief system of GR is false and invalid.
If you can't measure an acceleration you aren't
LOL
why do I care what a religious fruitloop believes
your argument always seems to include some type of
anti religious remarks when your knowledge fails to
rescue you from the really stupid situations you get
yourself into because of your lack of knowledge.
try learning the basics of physics orac , it cant hurt
and may actually help you in your quest for the fantastic
that you have submerged yourself into.
