Originally Posted By: paul

I see the fine State of Kansas is not suckin the hind tit on
this matter , they have achieved somewhat of a immunity to
the illegal gun control practice being pursued and established in other obvious anti constitutional states.

http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/04/17/kansas-governor-signs-second-amendment-protection-act/

Quote:

Any act, law, treaty, order, rule or regulation of the government of the United States which violates the second amendment to the constitution of the United States is null, void and unenforceable in the state of Kansas.


and that is the way the us constitution reads.
any law that has been passed that infringes
the rights of a us citizen to bear arms is illegal.



Well, that is a fine example of a meaningless law. It is already a fact that anything that is unconstitutional is null and void in any US state, district, or territory, just as soon as the US Supreme Court rules that is is not constitutional. And the only entity that can rule on the constitutionality of any law, etc. is the US Supreme Court. A state law making such a statement is completely superfluous. And of course once the Supreme Court makes its ruling then that is the way it is.

Bill Gill

C is not the speed of light in a vacuum.
C is the universal speed limit.