Daniel,

I really don't think you wish to actually debate your views, only rubbish others. The study to which you quoted saying it was indisputable, was the study done by UK Met and Uni of Alabama. Its data was taken from one source, bouys in place for a little more than 20 years. Now if data can be said to be reliable, my guess is that data can be. That is not to say there might not be an argument with the location of the bouys etc, but for accuracy the data is difficult to contest.

It would actually be nice to see you back up just one of your statements with a reference to an actual study. Since you won't do it, I see no point in continuing, which is a pity.


Regards


Richard

Sane=fits in. Unreasonable=world needs to fit to him. All Progress requires unreasonableness