Home   |   News    |   Discussions   |   Books   |   Curiosities
Search
Custom Search
Popular Reads

Earthquakes and animal behavior
LHC may produce time travelling particles
Country boys boast bigger junk
Running the numbers on alien life
Uh-oh, placebo
Forgetful? Blame your house
Pill to blame for rise in prostate cancer?
Cat parasite has global ambitions
Carbon monoxide keeps city dwellers happy
Magnetic field alters moral judgments
Stars manufacturing organic matter?
Unnatural selection: Courtesy of The Pill
Men 2% funnier than women
Parasite rewires sexual attraction
Novel psychiatric drugs take aim at gut bacteria
Discussions
General Science

Not-Quite Science

Physics

Climate Change

Science Fiction

Past Forums

Sponsored Links
Browse

Animal Kingdom

Biology

Climate Change

Environment

Evolution

Genetics

Humans

Mind & Brain

Prehistory

Health & Diet

Health Threats

Health & Environment

Health: From The Lab

Mental Health

Reproductive Health

Energy Alternatives

Chemistry

Computing & Electronics

Nanotechnology

Pimping Nature

Robotics & AI

Physics

Space


Curiosities
Sci Shop
Peculiar and bizarre scientific stuff that you didn't even know existed and you don't need.
Books
Book Reviews
Rusty Rockets lists his all-time favorite science titles.
Archives
2012 2011 2010
2009 2008 2007
2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001
2000 1999 1998
Feature Archive


28 June 2010
Fundamental misunderstanding of cell signaling revealed
by Kate Melville

In new research that will profoundly impact our understanding of biological processes, Stanford University scientists have discovered that the way cells "talk" to each other is far more complicated and nuanced than previously thought.

"Think of cells as musicians in a jazz band," said the study's author Markus Covert, whose lab studies complex genetic systems. "One little trumpet starts to play, and the cells go off on their own riffs. One plays off of the other."

Up to now, most of the scientific information gathered on cell signaling has been obtained from populations of cells using bulk assays. The new study, published in Nature, shows that scientists have been misled by the results of the cell-population-based studies. "Population studies have not revealed the intricate network of information one observes at the single cell level," explains Covert. "What we see is that differences between cells matter. Even the nuances can play a role."

Cell signaling governs basic cellular activities in the human body. The ability of cells to correctly respond to their environments is the basis of all development, tissue repair and immunity. A better understanding of how cells talk to each other could lead to new insights into how larger biological systems operate, and possibly lead to cures for such diseases as cancer, diabetes and autoimmune disorders.

To study individual cell reactions during the cell-signaling process, Covert's lab joined forces with Stephen Quake, a bioengineer at Stanford. Quake invented the biological equivalent of the integrated circuit - the microfluidic chip - which enables the study of single cells. In this study, Quake and Covert put it to use to investigate inflammatory cell signaling. "This study is a beautiful biological application of microfluidic cell culture and really illustrates the power of the technology," Quake said.

The chip contains the microscopic equivalent of test tubes, pipettes and petri dishes. Valves and gates control fluid flow. By regulating flow, the chip carries out dozens of experiments at the same time. It's essentially a lab on a chip. "We used a microfluidics platform that could maintain and monitor cell cultures 96 at a time," Covert said. "I was doing one at a time before that. Over a one-year period, we were able to study, with unprecedented detail, how 5,000 cells responded to signals. This took us to a totally new dimension."

In the lab, the scientists put mouse fibroblast cells onto the chip and let them grow in an environmental chamber, which is mounted on an inverted microscope. The entire system, which fits on a small desktop, is computerized and provides long-term monitoring of the individual cell's response to a signal by taking pictures every few minutes. For this study, Covert, Quake and their colleagues stimulated the cells with various concentrations of a protein that typically elicits the immune system's response to infection or cancer.

"What we found is that some cells receive the signal and activate, and some don't," said co-researcher Savas Tay. In the images, the scientists could see that the cells responded in various ways, with different timing and number of oscillations, yet their primary response, in many respects, was equal. "Previously, we used to see the cell as a messy blob of biological material, yet there is great engineering down there," explained Tay. "We needed to use mathematical modeling to understand what is going on."

"The cells were doing totally different things and we've been totally missing it," Covert added.

Related:
Geometry influences stem cell differentiation
Microbe Colonies Show Sophisticated Learning Behaviors

Source: Stanford University Medical Center


Social

Follow Science a GoGo


Home         All The News      Science Forum         Books, Books, Books         Curiosity Shop         About

The terms and conditions governing your use of this website.
Copyright © 1997 - 2012 Science a Go Go and its licensors. All rights reserved.