Home   |   News   |   Discussion Forum   |   Books   |   Curiosity Shop
Discussion Forum
Science Talk
Discuss scientific conundrums with our motley band of bamboozled boffins.
Latest Posts
Why is our blood red
by janelee
Yesterday at 10:17 PM
Unified Field Theory?
by TheodoreToth
Yesterday at 08:41 PM
CFL - tempers in the house of (representatives ? )
by paul
Yesterday at 08:10 PM
a serious question to the forum
by paul
Yesterday at 07:22 PM
The Concept of the Whole and Threadism
by Revlgking
Yesterday at 11:45 AM
Search
Custom Search
Sponsored Links
Most Read
Hormones gone wild
Homo superior
New IPCC climate warning
In space, no one can hear you say "doh!"
Bow to your insect overlords!
Penis enlargement surprise: it's possible
Sex and the schizoid factor
Delusions and mental illness
We come in peace – not!
Eeew!
Small penis syndrome a big problem?
Have you hugged your robot today?
Down on the farm - yields, nutrients and soil quality
Cat parasite has global ambitions
Pop goes the planet
The disappearing male
Missing link a tripping chimp?
Inorganic dust formations alive?
Science Shopping
Sci Shop
Peculiar scientific stuff that you didn't even know existed and you don't need.
News And Research

Physics

Climate Change

Space

Natural World

Health

Technology



All 2009 News

Science Books
Book Reviews
Rusty Rockets reviews this week's science titles and lists his all-time faves.
Archives
2009 2008 2007
2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001
2000 1999 1998
Discussion Archive
Feature Archive


13 November 2006
Chaotic Neurons Enhance Brain's Processing
by Kate Melville

Scientists may have finally discovered why the neurons in the human brain seem to fire in utterly random ways. In the latest issue of Nature Neuroscience, University of Rochester researchers show how the brain's cortex uses seemingly chaotic - or "noisy" - signals to represent the ambiguities of the real world; and that this noise dramatically enhances the brain's processing power.

The new work connects two of the brain's biggest mysteries; why it's so "noisy", and how it can perform such complex calculations. As counter-intuitive as it sounds, the noise appears to be integral to making those calculations possible. "You'd think this is crazy because engineers are always fighting to reduce the noise in their circuits, and yet here's the best computing machine in the universe - and it looks utterly random," said Rochester brain boffin, Alex Pouget.

Rather than being analogous to a traditional digital computational model, Pouget explained how the reality of brain function seems to be a confusing array of possibilities and probabilities, all of which are somehow, mysteriously, properly calculated. The science of drawing answers from such a variety of probabilities is called Bayesian computing. Pouget says that when we seem to be struck by an idea from out of the blue, our brain has actually just resolved many probabilities its been fervently calculating in the background.

"[The brain is] excellent at taking various bits of probability information, weighing their relative worth, and coming to a good conclusion quickly," Pouget continued. "But we've always been at a loss to explain how our brains are able to conduct such complex Bayesian computations so easily."

Two years ago, Pouget began questioning the function of the "noise" inherent in neuron function and began to realize that what looked like noise, might actually be the brain's way of running at optimal performance. Bayesian computing can be done most efficiently when data is formatted in what's called a "Poisson distribution," and the neural noise, Pouget noticed, looked suspiciously like this optimal distribution.

Pouget and his team then investigated whether neuronal noise fitted this Poisson distribution, and found that it fitted extremely well. "The cortex appears wired at its foundation to run Bayesian computations as efficiently as can be possible," he said. "The uncertainty of the real world is represented by this noise, and the noise itself is in a format that reduces the resources needed to compute it," he added.

"Variability" may be a better word then "noise" to describe such neuron responses, according to Pouget. The team are now expanding their findings across the entire cortex, because every part of our highly developed cortex displays a similar underlying Bayes-optimal structure.

"If the structure is the same, that means there must be something fundamentally similar among vision, movement, reasoning, loving - anything that takes place in the human cortex," says Pouget. "The way you learn language must be essentially the same as the way a doctor reasons out a diagnosis, and right now our lab is pushing hard to find out exactly how that noise makes all these different aspects of being human possible."

Related Articles
Neurons Mix Digital And Analog Functionality

Source: University of Rochester



Home            News            Discussion Forum            Books            Curiosity Shop            About

The terms and conditions governing your use of this website.
Copyright © 1997 - 2009 Science a Go Go and its licensors. All rights reserved.